|
Mex Martillo 6:55 Sun May 14
Back 4?
|
|
Bilic and the team cannot do back 4
I am not sure why?
Is it that Byran and Cresswell are not good enough?
Is it the training?
The centre backs are okay when there are 3, so I guess they are okay, but take one out and move the "wing backs" a bit back to a back 4 and it all goes to pieces, absolute crap...
Today, we were doing okay until we went to a back 4 and then as I said, absolute crap...
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Shane_WHUFC
7:20 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
Spandex Sidney 7:01 Sun May 14
We havent played 4 at the back for 30 games.
|
Mex Martillo
7:20 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
I would agree with that GreenStreet
Cresswell defended better earlier in the season, but of late has not been to good and Byran has always been better going forward than defending.
|
Mex Martillo
7:18 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
I would not go that far to say most games are crap, but I have this feeling that trying to play a back 4 has been a problem all season.
We are much better with 3-4-3 or 3-5-2. I guess at the end of the day, with that formation when pushed back we have a back 5 and may be our defenders are just not good enough to defend as 4 and we have to have 5?
|
GreenStreetPlayer
7:14 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
Probably shows Byram and Cresswell do their best work down the other end of the pitch.
|
Spandex Sidney
7:01 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
Shane_WHUFC 6:56 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
Wouldn't read too much into todays game, it was a nothing match.
What about the other 30 odd games this season where we've been served up the exact same shit?
|
AVOR
6:57 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
PACE....its the problem we have all over the pitch
|
Shane_WHUFC
6:56 Sun May 14
Re: Back 4?
|
Wouldn't read too much into todays game, it was a nothing match.
|
|
|
|
